← All guides

How much protein do you actually need?

An evidence-based guide to the one nutrition number most people get wrong in both directions — protein. This covers the daily target for active people and anyone building or keeping muscle, the higher intakes that protect lean mass when you're dieting hard, how much to eat per meal and how to spread it, why the daily total matters more than precise timing, the quality difference between plant and animal sources, and the honest myths — you don't need shakes, and more isn't unlimited-better. Practical, and grounded in published sports-nutrition consensus.

Here's the short answer: most active people who want to build or keep muscle do well on roughly 1.4–2.0 g of protein per kg of body weight per day — up to about 2.2 g/kg for hard resistance training — spread across the day in meals of roughly 20–40 g each. The total you eat over the day matters far more than the exact timing, and once you're hitting that target, more protein doesn't buy more muscle. Everything below is the detail behind that sentence: the numbers, where they come from, and how to make them work for you.

On this page

  1. Survival vs. thriving — why the RDA is a floor
  2. The daily number for active people
  3. A worked daily target
  4. When you're dieting hard — protecting muscle
  5. Per-meal dosing and spreading it out
  6. Timing — total daily protein beats the "window"
  7. Quality and sources — plant, animal and leucine
  8. Do you need protein shakes?
  9. Is more always better?
  10. Common questions
  11. Takeaways

A framing note before the numbers. Protein needs are well studied, but people differ — body size, training, age, sex, how lean you are and your goals all shift what's right for you. So this is written as can, tends to and around, never as a guarantee, and every specific figure is a population-level guide drawn from published consensus, not a personal prescription. It's general education, not medical or dietary advice, and it isn't a personalised plan.

Survival vs. thriving — why the RDA is a floor

The number most people half-remember — the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of about 0.8 g of protein per kg of body weight per day — is real, but it answers a different question than the one you're asking. The RDA was set to estimate the minimum intake needed to stop the average sedentary adult from slowly losing body protein — a floor to prevent deficiency, not a target to build or keep muscle on. It has been essentially unchanged for decades and was never meant to describe what an active body thrives on.

Once you train — and especially once you lift — the picture changes. Exercise damages and remodels muscle, raises protein turnover, and (with enough total food) lets you add lean tissue. All of that draws on dietary protein, so the amount that keeps a sofa-bound person out of deficiency is well short of the amount that lets a training person adapt. That's why every sports-nutrition body sets its recommendations above the RDA, not at it.

Common misconception → correct it. "The RDA is 0.8 g/kg, so anything more is a waste or a fad." Backwards. The RDA is a deficiency-avoidance floor for sedentary people, not an optimum for anyone training. The whole body of sports-nutrition evidence points to active people needing meaningfully more — commonly around double the RDA — to support repair, adaptation and muscle building. Eating to the floor while training hard is one of the quiet ways people stall.

The daily number for active people

Two of the most authoritative consensus documents converge on a similar band. The joint position on nutrition and athletic performance from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada and the American College of Sports Medicine recommends daily protein of roughly 1.2–2.0 g per kg of body weight to support training adaptation, repair and remodelling. The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) position stand on protein and exercise puts the range for building and maintaining muscle at 1.4–2.0 g/kg/day for most exercising people, and adds a useful nuance: endurance athletes sit toward the lower end, those doing intermittent or mixed sports in the middle, and strength or power athletes toward the upper end.

Where within that range should a dedicated lifter aim? A large 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis (49 studies, over 1,800 participants) found that adding protein reliably increased muscle and strength gains from resistance training — but that the benefit to lean mass largely plateaued once total intake reached about 1.6 g/kg/day, with the upper edge of the statistical confidence interval near 2.2 g/kg/day. That is exactly where the popular practical target of around 1.6–2.2 g/kg/day for hard resistance training comes from: about 1.6 g/kg is where most of the muscle-building payoff has already been captured, and 2.2 g/kg is a sensible ceiling that covers individual variation without overshooting into pointless excess. That same review noted the effect shrank with age (older adults may need to sit higher in the range) and was stronger in people who were already resistance-trained.

A worked daily target

Grams per kilogram is abstract until you put a body weight to it. Here's the same guidance turned into real daily totals for a few example weights, using the common active-person band. Read it as a range to land inside, not a single figure to hit exactly.

Body weight General active / endurance-leaning (~1.4 g/kg) Building / keeping muscle (~1.8 g/kg) Hard resistance training (~2.2 g/kg)
60 kg ~84 g ~108 g ~132 g
70 kg ~98 g ~126 g ~154 g
80 kg ~112 g ~144 g ~176 g
90 kg ~126 g ~162 g ~198 g

A couple of honest caveats so you use this well. The figures are illustrative arithmetic from the consensus ranges above, not a prescription — your own number depends on your sport, your goal, your age and how much lean mass you carry. And if you're carrying a lot of excess body fat, calculating protein off a target or reference body weight (rather than total scale weight) tends to give a more sensible number, since fat mass isn't the tissue driving your protein needs.

Strathlon daily tracker showing a protein target alongside calories, with protein logged across the day's meals
Strathlon's tracker puts a protein target next to your calories and counts it up across the day, so “did I actually hit my protein?” becomes a glance rather than a guess.

When you're dieting hard — protecting muscle

Protein needs go up, not down, when you're in a calorie deficit trying to lose fat. Two things happen when energy is scarce: your body is more inclined to break down muscle for fuel, and higher protein helps blunt that while keeping you fuller. So the harder and leaner you diet, the more protein helps protect the muscle you already have.

The ISSN position stand reflects this directly: it notes that higher intakes of roughly 2.3–3.1 g/kg/day may be needed to preserve lean body mass in resistance-trained people during hypocaloric (calorie-restricted) periods. The underlying research is usually framed per kilogram of fat-free (lean) mass, and the practical rule of thumb that falls out of it is intuitive: the leaner you already are and the more aggressive the deficit, the higher within that range you should push protein. A relatively lean physique athlete crash-cutting for a deadline is the case for the top of the range; someone with plenty of fat to lose on a gentle deficit needs far less.

Common misconception → correct it. "When I'm cutting calories I should cut protein too." The opposite. Protein is the macronutrient you most want to protect (or even raise) in a deficit, because it defends muscle and helps with fullness while you eat less overall. Trim the deficit out of carbohydrate and fat around a held-high protein intake — not by shaving protein down with everything else.

Per-meal dosing and spreading it out

The daily total is the headline, but how you split it up matters at the margins. After a protein-containing meal, muscle protein synthesis rises and then settles — and it's maximised by a fairly modest dose, not an enormous one. The ISSN suggests about 0.25 g of high-quality protein per kg of body weight, or an absolute dose of roughly 20–40 g, per serving, with servings every three to four hours across the day. Reviewers who looked specifically at daily distribution put a slightly more generous practical ceiling of about 0.4 g/kg per meal, eaten across at least four meals, as a reliable way to reach a muscle-building daily total.

Put together, that gives a simple pattern: aim for something like 0.25–0.4 g/kg (roughly 20–40 g) of protein per meal, three to five times a day. This is the practical case for not saving all your protein for one big dinner: three or four moderate protein feeds tend to stimulate more total muscle-building signal across the day than a single large one, even for the same total grams. Older adults in particular seem to benefit from making sure each meal clears a decent protein dose, because ageing muscle is a little less responsive to small amounts.

Common misconception → correct it. "The body can only absorb 30 g of protein at a time, so anything more is wasted." Not true as usually stated. You digest and absorb almost all the protein you eat, regardless of the amount. What plateaus around 20–40 g is the muscle-building signal from a single meal — protein beyond that in one sitting is still used for other jobs and burned for energy, it just doesn't add more to that meal's growth stimulus. That's a reason to spread protein for efficiency, not a reason to fear a big steak.

Timing — total daily protein beats the "window"

Few fitness ideas are as sticky as the anabolic window — the belief that you must slam protein within minutes of finishing a workout or forfeit your gains. The evidence has walked this back a long way. The ISSN position stand concludes that total protein and calorie intake is the most important consideration for adapting to resistance training, and that the effect of eating protein immediately before or after training, over and above hitting your daily total, is minimal in non-athletic populations.

That doesn't make timing worthless — it makes it a second-order concern. Having some protein in the hours around training is sensible, and spreading protein evenly across the day (rather than skewing it all to one meal) has a modest edge. But the window is measured in hours, not minutes, and it sits on top of the thing that actually decides the outcome: did you hit your daily protein target? Get the total right first; worry about distribution second; stop worrying about the stopwatch almost entirely.

Where Strathlon fits. Strathlon is built to keep the part that matters — your daily total — honest, rather than chasing the part that doesn't. Your protein target sits right alongside calories in the tracker, and every food you log counts toward it, so “am I actually near my number?” is a glance instead of a mental tally. When you record a session through Add activity or add training on the Plan tab with + Add activity, the app nudges the day's targets to match the work you did, and the goal- and sport-aware tips lean toward protein and recovery when you've trained hard. Strathlon won't weigh your chicken for you — but it turns hitting a daily protein target from a guess into something you can see.
Strathlon Add activity screen with a training session being logged
Logging a session in Strathlon's “Add activity” flow. Recording training is what lets the app adjust the day's calorie and protein targets around the work you actually did.

Quality and sources — plant, animal and leucine

Not all protein is equally good at building muscle, and the difference comes down mostly to two things: amino acid profile (especially the amount of leucine, the amino acid that acts as the main on-switch for muscle protein synthesis) and digestibility. Animal proteins — whey, milk, eggs, meat and fish — tend to be complete, highly digestible and leucine-rich, which is why the ISSN highlights leucine-containing doses of roughly 700–3000 mg (about 1–3 g of leucine) per meal as part of what maximises the response, an amount animal foods reach easily.

Single plant proteins tend to fall a little short: they're often lower in leucine, sometimes missing or low in one or more essential amino acids, and can be less digestible. In head-to-head studies, animal sources such as milk protein have edged out single plant sources like soy for lean-mass gains. But — and this matters — the gap is closable. Eating a bit more total plant protein, combining sources so their amino acids complement each other (classically legumes with grains), and making sure each meal carries enough leucine largely evens things out. A well-planned plant-based or mixed diet with enough total protein builds and keeps muscle perfectly well; you just have to be a little more deliberate about quantity and variety.

Common misconception → correct it. "You can't build muscle on plants." Overstated. It's true that gram for gram many single plant proteins are slightly less effective, mainly on leucine and digestibility. But that's a reason to eat a bit more and combine sources, not a wall. Plenty of strong, muscular people eat entirely plant-based — they simply mind their total protein and variety a little more carefully than someone leaning on whey and eggs.

Do you need protein shakes?

No. This is worth stating plainly because the supplement industry works hard to blur it. The ISSN is explicit that it is possible to meet your protein needs from whole foods, and that supplementation is simply a practical, convenient way to get there. A protein shake is nothing more than a portable, cheap, fast, easily measured source of high-quality protein. It has no special muscle-building property that chicken, fish, eggs, dairy, tofu, beans or lentils lack.

Where powders genuinely earn their place is convenience: hitting a high daily target when you're busy or travelling, getting protein in when your appetite is low, or topping up around training without cooking. If those describe you, a shake is a useful tool. If you can comfortably reach your daily number with food you enjoy, you can skip powder entirely and lose nothing. Think of it as a shortcut, never a requirement.

Common misconception → correct it. "Serious training means protein shakes." Marketing, not physiology. The fundamentals that build muscle are progressive training, enough total protein and energy, and recovery — none of which require a tub of powder. Whole-food protein does the same job; a shake just makes the logistics easier for some people. Buy it for convenience if it helps, not because you think it's doing something food can't.

Is more always better?

Given all this, why not just eat as much protein as possible? Because the benefit has a ceiling. As the meta-analysis showed, muscle-building gains from extra protein largely level off once you're around 1.6 g/kg/day, and the practical top end for hard training sits near 2.2 g/kg. Push past what your goal needs and you don't add more muscle — you're just eating protein your body oxidises for energy like any other calorie.

There's also an opportunity cost. Every extra gram of protein is a gram of carbohydrate or fat you didn't eat — and for an active person, carbohydrate is often the fuel that actually powers hard training. Crowding your plate with excess protein can quietly leave you under-fuelled for performance. On safety, the reassuring news is that for healthy people the intakes used in training — up to around 2 g/kg/day, and higher for short dieting phases — are well tolerated in the research, with no established harm to healthy kidneys or bones. The clear exception is anyone with existing kidney disease or another relevant medical condition, who should get individual advice before eating high protein. For everyone else the message is simply: hit your target, and there's no prize for wildly exceeding it.

Common misconception → correct it. "If some protein is good, loads must be better — and it'll wreck my kidneys." Two myths at once. More protein isn't unlimited-better: past your goal's target it adds no extra muscle and just displaces training fuel. And in healthy people, high-protein diets in the training range are not associated with kidney or bone harm in the evidence. Both the “more is always better” and the “protein is dangerous” camps are overshooting the truth, which sits calmly in the middle.

Common questions

How much protein do I actually need per day?

It depends on what you're asking your body to do. The baseline Recommended Dietary Allowance to prevent deficiency is about 0.8 g of protein per kg of body weight per day, but that is a floor for sedentary people, not an optimum. For active people and anyone building or keeping muscle, sports-nutrition position stands put the useful range at roughly 1.2–2.0 g/kg/day (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada and the American College of Sports Medicine) or 1.4–2.0 g/kg/day (International Society of Sports Nutrition), with endurance athletes toward the lower end and strength or power athletes toward the upper end. A widely cited meta-analysis found muscle-building gains from extra protein largely plateau once total intake reaches about 1.6 g/kg/day, with the upper confidence limit near 2.2 g/kg/day — which is where the practical target of about 1.6–2.2 g/kg/day for hard resistance training comes from.

Does protein timing matter, or just the daily total?

For most people the daily total matters far more than the exact timing. The International Society of Sports Nutrition concludes that total protein and calorie intake is the most important consideration for adapting to resistance training, and that the effect of eating protein immediately before or after training is minimal in non-athletic populations. There is a modest benefit to spreading protein across the day rather than piling it into one meal — roughly a dose every three to four hours — but the old idea of a narrow anabolic window you must hit within minutes of training is overstated. Hit your daily number first; distribute it sensibly second.

How much protein can I use in one meal?

Muscle protein synthesis after a meal is maximised by a fairly modest dose. The International Society of Sports Nutrition suggests about 0.25 g of high-quality protein per kg of body weight, or an absolute dose of roughly 20–40 g, per meal. Reviewers who looked specifically at daily distribution suggest a slightly more generous ceiling of about 0.4 g/kg per meal, eaten across at least four meals, to comfortably reach a muscle-building daily total. Protein beyond the amount that maximises synthesis in one sitting is not wasted — it is still used for other functions and oxidised for energy — but the extra doesn't add more to the muscle-building signal from that meal, which is the practical reason to spread protein out rather than saving it all for dinner.

Is plant protein as good as animal protein for building muscle?

Gram for gram, many single plant proteins are slightly less effective than animal proteins for building muscle, because they tend to be lower in the amino acid leucine (the main trigger for muscle protein synthesis) and less complete or less digestible. Position-stand evidence generally ranks animal proteins such as whey, milk and eggs above single plant sources like soy for lean-mass gains. But this is a gap you can close: eating a bit more total plant protein, combining sources so the amino acids complement each other (for example legumes with grains), and making sure each meal carries enough leucine largely levels the playing field. A well-planned plant-based diet with enough total protein can absolutely build and keep muscle.

Do you need protein shakes to hit your target?

No. Protein powder is a convenience, not a requirement. The International Society of Sports Nutrition is explicit that it is possible to meet your protein needs from whole foods, and that supplementation is simply a practical way to do it. A shake is just a portable, cheap, fast source of protein — useful when you're busy, travelling, or short of appetite — but it holds no special muscle-building magic over chicken, fish, eggs, dairy, tofu, beans or lentils. If you can hit your daily number with food you enjoy, you need no powder at all.

Can you eat too much protein?

For healthy people, protein intakes in the ranges used for training — up to around 2 g/kg/day, and higher for short periods when dieting — are well tolerated and not associated with harm to healthy kidneys or bones in the research. But more is not unlimited-better: once you're meeting your muscle-building target, extra protein doesn't add more muscle, and every gram of protein you eat displaces a gram of carbohydrate or fat you might have used for training fuel or satiety. Very high intakes are simply unnecessary for most goals. The exception is people with existing kidney disease or another medical condition, who should get individual advice before pushing protein high.

Takeaways

If you remember one thing, make it the daily total: pick a target in the band that fits your training — around 1.6–2.2 g/kg if you're chasing muscle — split it into a few moderate protein meals, and stop sweating the rest. Strathlon's job is to keep that daily number visible and honest, adjusting your targets around the training you actually log, so the part that decides the outcome is the part you can see at a glance.

This is general educational information, not medical, dietary or coaching advice. The protein figures here are drawn from established sports-nutrition consensus and are framed as population-level guides — individual needs vary widely with body size, training, age, sex and health, and are best personalised with a qualified professional. Anyone with a health condition (particularly kidney disease), a history of disordered eating, or who is pregnant or postpartum, should consult a physician or registered dietitian before making significant changes to protein intake. See our Terms for more.

← All guides · How muscle actually grows · Eating to build muscle · Eating for results · Pre- & post-workout nutrition · Home